| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Prices subject to change)
|
|
| |
|
Label: |
|
Philips Classics - http://www.deccaclassics.com/ |
Serial: |
|
470 618-2 |
Title: |
|
Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade, Borodin, Balakirev - Gergiev |
Description: |
|
Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade, Borodin: In the Steppes of Central Asia, Balakirev: Islamey
Sergei Levitin (violin)
Kirov Orchestra
Valery Gergiev (conductor) |
Details: |
|
1-4. Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade, Op.35 "Symphonic suite after A Thousand and One Nights"
5. Alexander Borodin: In the Steppes of Central Asia
6. Mily Balakirev (orch. Lyapunov): Islamey
Total time: 62:31 |
Genre: |
|
Classical - Orchestral |
Content: |
|
Stereo/Multichannel |
Media: |
|
Hybrid |
Recording type: |
|
PCM |
Recording info: |
|
Recorded: Mariinsky Theatre, St Petersburg, Russia, 23–25 November, 2001 |
|
Review by madisonears October 7, 2003 (10 of 12 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
Good controversy going here, which is what forums like this are all about.
I am a tireless proponent of SACD and I have invested in about 80 or so. This is one of the very few that I had to get rid of. I can't believe professional musicians and recording executives would allow this junk to be put on the market. I listened once and I wasn't sure it was as bad as I thought, so I listened again a few days later (mood has a lot to do with our interpretation of musical information). It was WORSE. Worst performance, among the dozen or so I've heard and liked over many years, with a grotesque and boring interpretation. Worst sound of almost any modern recording I can think of, with no air, no life, no presence, weird sonic attributes.
This disc will be the punchline of a joke someday, but right now it is merely an insult to the art of music performance and recording.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Review by thepilot September 5, 2004 (7 of 11 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
| The performance is truly as good as Reiner's and Sir Thomas Beecham's classic versions, not to forget Sir Charles Mackerras' equally astounding rendition for Telarc. The sound could have been better (too many microphones and some PCM harshness), but it is good to have such an astounding Scheherazade in multichannel DSD sound. Those who disagree propably have systems that cannot accomodate the wide dymanic range of the disc, the higher than average level and the elevated treble energy.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Review by 2-channel February 11, 2006 (6 of 11 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics (S): |
Incredibly (and perhaps, worryingly) this disc gets a Rosette and an almost unequivocal thumbs-up from the 'Penguin Guide'. It also gives a strong clue as to why it so instantly dislikeable. Artificial reverb. Not a dash here and there, the disc is AWASH with artificial reverb of the most intrusive kind - giving it an overbright, ruinous, glassy sheen. Comrades, real-life reverb doesn't work like that.
One can only assume that the professional reviewers have some rose-tinted ears, of which I would dearly like a pair.
The performance, from my much less well-educated musical perspective, is too exciting and red-blooded by half - the faster passages blurring in the overpaced tempi.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
