|
|
|
rammiepie said:
Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha!
Thread: Flying Dutchman LIVE always sounds awful ~ WHY?
Ha!
You'll have to ask someone who loves Wagner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
flyingdutchman said:
You'll have to ask someone who loves Wagner.
Quite witty retort, Snoop!
BTW, Ultra Vivid has a UV index of 75!
|
|
|
|
|
|
rammiepie said:
Quite witty retort, Snoop!
BTW, Ultra Vivid has a UV index of 75!
I'll remember that when I worry about my discs getting sunburn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
flyingdutchman said:
What windsurfer pointed out was that the owner didn't feel that Mch could be done to his satisfaction which 100% coincides with what I said. Euell reads into things way too much and quite honestly gets it wrong every time.
As for the rest of which Euell, the ignorant, points out about what I said of the Japanese market is wrong as well, but then I expect that of someone who has no idea of what he's talking about.
The Japanese market, like the rest of the world, went with Mch recordings because it was what the rest of the world was doing and they felt Mch was where it was at (they went along with the in-crowd). However, as is clear, or from what windsurfer summized anyway, it is that the owner doesn't feel that MCH can be done adequately and so they have gone back to what they can do adequately, i.e., stereo.
Gee, what I said was totally accurate and again you can bow to my supreme knowledge.
Flying Dutchman, your arrogance and distortions are just incredible. You absolutely distorted what Windsurfer said. Here is the quote:
"It is my understanding that the owner of Exton has not been convinced that multi-channel is or can be satisfying. My Exton MCH discs are rather mediocre to unsatisfactory and I am a big multi-channel adherent. This also explains Exton's tendency to record the same repertory over and over with different artists. Its what the owner likes."
In other words, Dummy, Windsurfer says it's what the owner likes. Get it? No, I suppose probably not.
|
|
