| Site review by Polly Nomial April 18, 2005
|
Performance: |
How to review this recording? It's very tricky and provoked mixed reactions for me whilst listening.
Personally, I find this recording to be a supreme example of the "old school" in Beethoven playing and conducting: superbly rich & polished playing/singing without a hint of roughness. That is *not* to say that there aren't accents or the like but that they are executed with the same care and tenderness as awarded to the pianissimo entries. The recording has something to do with this effect too (more of which later).
Throughout the playing is sustained in all sections of the orchestra and immaculately phrased. Karajan's pacing is logical, steady (but not slow) and unerring throughout and the climaxes are built relentlessly to towering fortissimos, especially in the first movement (you really hear where Bruckner's 9th comes from!) In the second movement the playing is fleet-of-foot and here, I find that the recording is guilty of "smoothing" some accents a little. The slow movement is simply and beautifully played without too much romantic phrasing being evident. The finale has moments when it appears a bit sluggish by modern standards but is well played. The orchestral playing is committed and biting throughout (the orchestral declamation just before the entrance of the tenor is particularly exciting). The soloists are well matched and clearly fit well with Karajan's conception. However, the chorus is large and hence seem to make rather heavy weather of the faster moments. At the very end, the coda finishes in a blaze that, in other works, Karajan seemed reluctant to allow his forces to display. In short, a highly recommendable version of this masterpiece although the new Del Mar texts require anyone seriously interested in Beethoven's original thoughts to seek one of Haitink's (Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 - Haitink) or Vänskä's (Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 - Vänskä) accounts.
The recording itself though is highly controversial. I find that the acoustic of the Philharmonie is fairly well reproduced, as is the glorious but steely tone of the BPO. However, the sound seems to be at once distant (robbing the strings of some bite and damping the accents) and close (giving at times, a very congested sound - particularly during the choral forte's). In some ways I'd like to give the sound 4-4.5 stars as the BPO actually sound like the BPO but equally I'd like to give 0.5-1 stars for the way that the accents are smoothed over (even though one can hear the instrumentalists playing them in the timbre produced). I'll leave it blank! (I wouldn't want to put anyone off from getting this recording if they are on the look out for an "old school" performance - just be advised that some of the sound quality is more than a little strange & so not a demo disc.)
(Purchased)
|
Copyright © 2005 John Broggio and SA-CD.net
|
|
|
| Review by peteyspambucket July 21, 2003 (1 of 4 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
I had great expectations for this recording. I thought for sure that SACD would unlock the details from the recording masters of this performance, but no dice. This has to be one of the worst SACDs I've heard. It sounds like it came from a bad cassette. The strings sound very tinny, and the voices in the last movement have a digital sheen all over them.
From the performance standpoint, this was always a very nice recording, but I preferred Karajan's later recording of this. If any of the DG Bohm or DG Bernstein recordings of the 9th come out, they would be more interesting than this one.
Wait for a better recording of the 9th to be released, and skip this one. I'm hoping DG gets better with SACD because they have an enormous catalog of awesome recordings that need to be released on SACD.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
| Review by tfkaudio January 16, 2004 (3 of 8 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
| Add one more 1 star rating. The SACD sound is no better than CD. The performance is a classic, but really a disappointing SACD.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
| Review by WalterM May 6, 2004 (3 of 5 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
A classic performance with 1976 sound. I thought the sonics were better than the previous reviewers. I listened with low expectations but was pleasently surprised. Better sonics than the CD.
Reviewed in Multichannel format
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
| Review by beas April 17, 2005 (2 of 5 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics: |
| I must say I was very dissapointed with the sound stage produced by this disc. I certainly agree with other reviewers,look for another recording.At$44Aus this could be a very expensive waste of money,lukilly I paid less than half of this.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
| Review by putmess February 1, 2007 (3 of 7 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics (S): |
A really disappointing SACD (stereo mode).
Very high sharp peaks, poor low tones, flat with screaming sound.
Some normal CDs sound better.
Re-sell on ebay and still regretting...
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
| Review by hiredfox April 4, 2009 (4 of 8 found this review helpful)
|
Performance: Sonics (S): |
This was a legendary recording when it first appeared with the Adagio spotlighted for it's achingly beautiful string playing.
What went wrong in the transfer? Patently this does not sound in any way like a SACD and even the performance has been diminished by whatever re-processing has been done.
Deeply disappointing and uninvolving, a poor buy by any standards.
|
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
